Home Infrastructure Unusual bridge strike closes one track of West Coast main line

Unusual bridge strike closes one track of West Coast main line

An unusual bridge strike closed one track on the West Coast main line and caused a speed restriction to be imposed across the whole route.

Normally, a bridge strike is caused when a vehicle attempts to go under a bridge that is too low for it. We’ve all seen the photos – crushed lorries, buses with the top deck knocked off, containers on their sides.

The impact can move the bridge, meaning the line above has to be closed while repairs take place.

But the bridge strike at Worston Lane, north of Stafford, was different. Here, the road runs above the railway, so there is no low bridge deck to hit.  There’s all the room in the world.

Except, at 10:00 on Thursday 14 February, an errant motorist hit the bridge structure – the brickwork above the abutment – knocking it out of place so it was in danger of coming down onto the track below. The vehicle then drove off, although how the driver could have been unaware of the damage both to the vehicle and the bridge is a mystery.

Close up of the damage to Worston Lane bridge. (Network Rail)

The track immediately under the damage was closed, and a temporary speed restriction imposed across the other tracks of the West Coast main line.

Network Rail engineers plan to carry out repairs overnight, and the road will remain closed while the work takes place.

There are around 2,000 bridge strikes a year on the railway network, the vast majority of them caused by high vehicles striking a bridge they are passing underneath. Each costs an average of £10,000 to repair and Network Rail pays £13 million in compensation to train operators for services they can’t run.

RailEngineer
RailEngineerhttp://www.railengineer.co.uk
Rail Engineer is the leading independent quality monthly magazine for engineers, project managers, directors and leading rail executive decision makers. Head to www.railsubs.com to make a free subscription to RailEngineer magazine or one of its sister publications.

1 COMMENT

  1. Can anybody tell us why this wall had been previously rebuilt. If it was from an earlier road vehicle strike then the occurrence is not as unusual as the headline suggests. Also it may indicate the need for some sort of roadside barrier to prevent future vehicle strikes.
    As the ‘new’ brickwork appears to be intact is this an indication that too strong a mortar was used thus ensuring that more of the older brickwork was damaged this time round.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Must Read

RIA launches RAIL 2050 Manifesto for the rail industry

As the UK heads towards a general election, the Railway Industry Association (RIA) has launched its RAIL 2050 Manifesto, setting out the...

Cornwall’s Capacity Triumph

Back in January 2018 (issue 159), Rail Engineer reported on a plan to increase the capacity of rail operations in Cornwall by...

Dawlish Sea Wall – the start of a 100-year plan

Over the last few years, Rail Engineer has written a number of articles about the Dawlish sea wall. There have been many pictures...

If it’s Tuesday it must be Olomouc

It is easy to sympathise with teachers who take groups of schoolchildren on educational visits, as they work hard to keep their...