Home Rail News C2E - Crossrail 1 1/2?

C2E – Crossrail 1 1/2?

With the main Crossrail project now mostly complete, and with tracks running right through the new tunnels, there has been much talk of Crossrail 2 as the next project, crossing under London from South West to North East and linking Wimbledon with the Leigh Valley.

Rather overlooked is a shorter-term proposal to extend the current Crossrail (or Elizabeth line as it will be called) from Abbey Wood to Ebbsfleet in Kent.

Two of Crossrail’s three ‘legs’ extend quite a way from London – in the West out to Reading and in Essex to Shenfield.

But in the South East the new railway emerges from the Plumstead portal and then stops at Abbey Wood station just a few hundred metres away. Passengers then cross the platform to pick up Southeastern services for onward travel.

But now an extension has been proposed to take the line on, calling at Belvedere, Erith, Slade Green, Dartford, Stone Crossing, Greenhithe, Swanscombe and terminating at Ebbsfleet.

Known as C2E – Crossrail 2 Ebbsfleet – this proposal would connect several major brownfield development sites with central London, London City and Heathrow airports, and the West, while also connecting Crossrail passengers with Eurostar and the continent.

Speaking at the recent seminar on ‘Delivering Crossrail and next steps for Crossrail 2’, organised by the Policy Forum for London, Paul Moore, director of place, communities and infrastructure for the London Borough of Bexley, explained that, just in Bexley, there was 1,100 acres of developable space available.

Talking as a sub-region, Dartford, Ebbsfleet, and Gravesham borough councils, the potential is for 55,000 new homes and £50,000 jobs – “serious, serious growth potential,” as Paul put it.

“These are some of the lowest land values around the M25,” he added. “There are reasons why this land has not been developed, in part because of the poor transport infrastructure. Both the frequency and the travel times for people in this part of the world are limited. Dartford is currently getting about six trains an hour, and there’s huge demand in the area for better services. ”

Which is what C2E is hoping to address. The plan is to have a fundable proposition ready for next summer.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Any Crossrail extension beyond Dartford, must continue to Gravesend – one of Kent’s largest towns.. The idea that it should terminate at Ebbsfleet (in reality Northfleet) is plain daft. I am not interested in Crossrail coming to Gravesham – if we are talking about a rebuilt Northfleet station 2 and a half miles from central Gravesend.
    The weakness of Gravesham Council on this hugely important transport matter, is astounding.
    Kent County Council have also shown their disinterest, in supporting Crossrail to Gravesend.
    Will no councillor for Kent or Gravesham, support that impoverished coastal town?
    The situation that the Lower Thames Crossing is somehow good for Gravesend – but a Crossrail extension is bad for Gravesend, is quite perverse.
    Gravesend has a substantial rail passenger usage. It would be unacceptable for the Gravesend area rail users, to (quite literally) have to take a hike away from the town, just to get on a Crossrail service. Time consuming and frankly, not really worth the effort.
    Ebbsfleet Development Corporation should have worked with Gravesham, in getting the route extended to both Ebbsfleet AND Gravesend – not just the former (which is of no benefit to Gravesend, nor it’s struggling economy).
    Between Northfleet and Gravesend, 3 tracking could be attained – thereby making a strong business case for it. Further, I hope that TFL and the Crossrail team, who helped secure the parliamentary safeguarding to Gravesend, look at the benefits of why Crossrail should go to both Ebbsfleet AND Gravesend respectively.

  2. If you look at the track layout at Abbey Wood, the connection to the North Kent Line is already built and I reckon with ERTMS, an appropriate number to trains could go past Abbey Wood to either Gravesend or Ebbsfleet. Reading is getting two tph, so I suspect two tph to both would be acceptable for a few years.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Must Read

Dawlish to get new sea wall

Government funding of £80 million has been announced to provide a new sea wall at Dawlish that will improve protection both for the railway...

Unusual bridge strike closes one track of West Coast main line

An unusual bridge strike closed one track on the West Coast main line and caused a speed restriction to be imposed across...

Stuart Calvert to be new Digital Railway head

Stuart Calvert, director of programme technical services and supply chain at Network Rail’s Group Digital Railway (GDR), has been announced as its new managing...

Major organisation changes at Network Rail

Network Rail has announced sweeping changes to its organisation following the completion of new chief executive Andrew Haines’ ‘100 Day Review’.

Danny Di Perna replaces Laurent Troger to head Bombardier Transportation

It’s all change at the top as Laurent Troger resigns as president of Bombardier Transportation to “pursue opportunities outside the company”. Danny...